Access Control - Revision history

Lxpk at 21:27, 19 December 2021

2021-12-19T21:27:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 19 December 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	[https://github.com/noisebridge/rfid-access-control https://github.com/noisebridge/rfid-access-control]		[https://github.com/noisebridge/rfid-access-control https://github.com/noisebridge/rfid-access-control]

	~~==Note:==~~		{{historic}}
	~~This page is very old and kept for "historical purposes".~~

	==General Access Proposals==		==General Access Proposals==

Lxpk at 21:26, 19 December 2021

2021-12-19T21:26:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 19 December 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~operations~~}}		{{272}}
	{{boxstart}}		{{boxstart}}
	Noisebridge uses electronic RFID tokens for access control.		Noisebridge uses electronic RFID tokens for access control.

Lxpk at 11:50, 19 June 2020

2020-06-19T11:50:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 19 June 2020
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028478.html Ring-based trust model]		* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028478.html Ring-based trust model]
	* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028531.html Badges to identify members and hackers]		* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028531.html Badges to identify members and hackers]

			*[[AccessControlModeling]]

Lxpk at 11:45, 19 June 2020

2020-06-19T11:45:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:45, 19 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{operations}}
			{{boxstart}}
			Noisebridge uses electronic RFID tokens for access control.
			{{boxend}}

	==Current Door Access Control system==		==Current Door Access Control system==
	The current (as of July 2017) Door Access Control system is on the Noisebridge Github:<br>		The current (as of July 2017) Door Access Control system is on the Noisebridge Github:<br>

Maltman23: Added link to Noisebridge Github, where Door Access Control system source resides

2017-07-11T21:00:47Z

Added link to Noisebridge Github, where Door Access Control system source resides

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 11 July 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Current Door Access Control system==
			The current (as of July 2017) Door Access Control system is on the Noisebridge Github:<br>
			[https://github.com/noisebridge/rfid-access-control https://github.com/noisebridge/rfid-access-control]

			==Note:==
	This page is very old and kept for "historical purposes".		This page is very old and kept for "historical purposes".

Robbintt at 20:40, 29 November 2016

2016-11-29T20:40:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 29 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==General Access Proposals==~~

	This page is very old and kept for "historical purposes".		This page is very old and kept for "historical purposes".

			==General Access Proposals==

	This is an outline to determine what we do and don't want an access control system to do. Just trying to keep up the excellence. Most of these came from Thursday's [[Social Engineers]] meeting discussion. Right now [[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] is listed as blocking most ideas because she made the page, but she's not alone on most of those, so feel free to add yourself if you're a member in good standing. The goal of this outline is to decide which ideas we should go forward with and which we can stop discussing.		This is an outline to determine what we do and don't want an access control system to do. Just trying to keep up the excellence. Most of these came from Thursday's [[Social Engineers]] meeting discussion. Right now [[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] is listed as blocking most ideas because she made the page, but she's not alone on most of those, so feel free to add yourself if you're a member in good standing. The goal of this outline is to decide which ideas we should go forward with and which we can stop discussing.

Robbintt at 20:39, 29 November 2016

2016-11-29T20:39:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 29 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==General Access Proposals==		==General Access Proposals==

			This page is very old and kept for "historical purposes".

	This is an outline to determine what we do and don't want an access control system to do. Just trying to keep up the excellence. Most of these came from Thursday's [[Social Engineers]] meeting discussion. Right now [[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] is listed as blocking most ideas because she made the page, but she's not alone on most of those, so feel free to add yourself if you're a member in good standing. The goal of this outline is to decide which ideas we should go forward with and which we can stop discussing.		This is an outline to determine what we do and don't want an access control system to do. Just trying to keep up the excellence. Most of these came from Thursday's [[Social Engineers]] meeting discussion. Right now [[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] is listed as blocking most ideas because she made the page, but she's not alone on most of those, so feel free to add yourself if you're a member in good standing. The goal of this outline is to decide which ideas we should go forward with and which we can stop discussing.

Flamsmark: /* General Access Proposals */

2012-02-16T20:04:34Z

General Access Proposals

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 16 February 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:
	**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] & [[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block		**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] & [[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block
	* install an always locked lock on the door at the top of the stairs to require someone in the space to have to let newcomers in and force at least a cursory vetting and inspection.		* install an always locked lock on the door at the top of the stairs to require someone in the space to have to let newcomers in and force at least a cursory vetting and inspection.
			* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028478.html Ring-based trust model]
			* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028531.html Badges to identify members and hackers]

98.248.181.46 at 08:13, 13 February 2012

2012-02-13T08:13:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 13 February 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	** At present, this is broadly opposed. Reconsider when keycode access is in place.		** At present, this is broadly opposed. Reconsider when keycode access is in place.
	*Periscope for checking who is at door		*Periscope for checking who is at door
	**Jake ~~is implementing~~ this.		**Jake has implemented this with a camera and tv monitor.
	*<strike>Members only hours</strike>		*<strike>Members only hours</strike>
	**Rachel Lyra would block (as would others)		**Rachel Lyra would block (as would others)

24.5.174.203: /* General Access Proposals */

2012-02-13T07:08:05Z

General Access Proposals

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 13 February 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	**Working group: [[Keycode Access]]		**Working group: [[Keycode Access]]
	*<strike>Remove buzzer entirely</strike>		*<strike>Remove buzzer entirely</strike>
	**At present, this is broadly opposed. Reconsider when keycode access is in place.		** At present, this is broadly opposed. Reconsider when keycode access is in place.
	*Periscope for checking who is at door		*Periscope for checking who is at door
	**Jake is implementing this.		**Jake is implementing this.
	*<strike>Members only hours</strike>		*<strike>Members only hours</strike>
	**Rachel Lyra would block (as would others)		**Rachel Lyra would block (as would others)
			**[[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block this as framed. If reframed as buzzer-free/no-walk-in hours, then block removed.
	*<strike>Blanket access fee, i.e. $10 to get in</strike>		*<strike>Blanket access fee, i.e. $10 to get in</strike>
	**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] would block		**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] & [[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block
	*<strike>Closing down at night (even to members)</strike>		*<strike>Closing down at night (even to members)</strike>
	**Come on people, this is silly.		** Come on people, this is silly.
	** How is it silly? The rest of SF shuts down after midnight, Noisebridge can too!		** How is it silly? The rest of SF shuts down after midnight, Noisebridge can too!
	** Noisebridge is fairly unlike the rest of SF.		** Noisebridge is fairly unlike the rest of SF.
			** If this isn't a joke... then [[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block
	*<strike>Cellphone entry only</strike>		*<strike>Cellphone entry only</strike>
	**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] would block		**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] & [[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block
	*<strike>Eliminating hardkeys and using only keycodes</strike>		*<strike>Eliminating hardkeys and using only keycodes</strike>
	**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] would block		**[[User:Hurtstotouchfire\|Hurtstotouchfire]] & [[User:Jared\|Jared]] would block
	* install an always locked lock on the door at the top of the stairs to require someone in the space to have to let newcomers in and force at least a cursory vetting and inspection.		* install an always locked lock on the door at the top of the stairs to require someone in the space to have to let newcomers in and force at least a cursory vetting and inspection.